|
Comparison testing for the
removal of mechanical emulsified oil from water was performed using
polypropylene storm drain insert filtration fabric, and X-Tex-AC-100
filtration fabric. The first sets of tests were conducted to look at
the efficiency of X-Tex-AC-100 to remove mechanical oil emulsion.
A stock of 6,600-mg/l oil (50% motor oil/diesel) and water emulsion
was made mechanically by blending and shaking in individual one
liter bottles. The oil water emulsion was poured through a 3inch
diameter filter housing holding one sheet of the polypropylene
insert fabric and one sheet of the X-Tex-AC-100, one additional
liter of water was passed through each filter apparatus, the water
was captured in a separatory funnel and extracted by method 1664 to
determine hexane extractable oil and grease. The Stock emulsion was
analyzed for ppm oil by running the water through the empty filter
holder accounting for retained oil on the bottle walls and filter
housing. The same process was repeated using two layers of each
material, the results obtained are as shown in figure 1 below.
Figure 1
|
Residual Oil After
|
| Material
Type |
Filtration
(mg/l) |
Percent
Oil Removal |
| Polypropylene 1 Layer |
651 |
90.2 |
| Polypropylene 2 Layer |
226 |
96.6 |
| X-Tex-AC 1 Layer |
44.3 |
99.3 |
| X-Tex-AC 2 Layer |
19.1 |
99.7 |
Figure 2 illustrates the residual oil in the water after passing
through each filter media.
Figure 2

Figure 3

Conclusion
These results demonstrate that X-Tex-AC-100 removes more of
the mechanical emulsified oil than the polypropylene products
(currently the industry standard).
|